MX-5 Miata Forum - BMW 540i Opinions Needed (2024)

Page 1 of 31 23>

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


MX-5 Miata Forum(https://forum.miata.net/vb/index.php)

- Car Talk(https://forum.miata.net/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=20)

- - BMW 540i Opinions Needed(https://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread.php?t=169029)


13BREMX513th February 2006 18:42

BMW 540i Opinions Needed

The Miata is not going anywhere, but I am looking to add a '97 BMW 540i by it's side. I think it is a great looking car, has a nice interior, 4 doors, and is essentially what I need in a car. What I want to know is if any of you have had one, or have any opinions about them. Any knowledge of the V8 around here? I do not know too much about them, but I trust the knowledge here. I also like the non-biased opinion compared to a BMW board. Any advice would be much appreciated.


rloewy13th February 2006 18:51

Never owned one - but a lot of my friends that did found them less than desirable compared to other BMW offering. It seems that there is a belief between these people that the previous generation (E34) was better designed and built. 2nd hand knowledge here - so it's worth exactly what you paid for it...


13BREMX513th February 2006 19:04

Good advice from Portland - no surprise there :)


MattAlley13th February 2006 19:23

Next door neighbor had a 2001, I think; was the one you're looking at an E39?
I drove it only once and it was a fun luxo-cruiser, but when I think of what that kind of bread gets you I'd rather have a sportscar. I just didn't think the experience was any better than, say, an A8 that I spent some time in as a loaner car. The 540 was quicker, but both were adequate and I just wasn't motivated to run either of them all that fast. Beautiful interior in the Bimmer, but nothing particularly special. I assume you're looking at an auto? That's what my neighbor had. They sold a six-speed, but hard to find and even harder to get rid of when you're finished. I dunno, it just didn't move me to the tune of 60,000 (very quickly depreciating) bucks.

But if you've chosen "Automatic German mid-sized V8 sedan" as a category, it's not a bad choice compared to A6 and E420 or E500. I guess my point is, in an automatic sedan I just don't care about "spirited performance driving", so I would buy on the basis of interior, and the Audi wins for me at all price points. That's why I've owned 2 Audis!

Matt


roja_dude13th February 2006 19:27

As an enthusiast and a poster here, I'd assume he meant the six-speed manual version. By "even harder to get rid of" do you mean that resale is poor on the manuals? Seems like their rarity would give added value (at least to the target market segment).


rloewy13th February 2006 19:31

Here is another anacdotal reference you might want to look at:

http://www.bmw2002faq.com/component/...ighlight,540i/


Jesda13th February 2006 19:33

I own an E34, and I would describe it as a Miata with four doors and a roof. Never driven the E39, but they are quite beautiful in a Teutonic way.


13BREMX513th February 2006 19:39

Looking for a 6-speed if I can find one, but most likely would end up with an automatic.

Also, I have found numerous 540i's, mostly 97-98, for under $15k. Seems like a pretty good value. I wouldn't buy a new one due to the depreciation.

I have a few reasons I am looking at a larger, luxory cruiser. My girlfriend just had our baby, which is not going in the Miata. I need something with four doors. I also work for a mortgage company and the it is becoming more likely that I will need to haul around clients. The Miata is not a good business car. Of course, I also want something fun to drive. It seems like the E39 540 runs the 1/4 in the low 14's, and there are good improvements to be made with intake and exhaust upgrades.

Finally, I am mostly concerned with the costs of parts. I imagine I can do 99% of the work myself, but I don't want things breaking every other week.

To the above reference, that was the 540it, which is a wagon. I am not at all interested in the wagon, and I would imagine it drives like an entirely different car.


rloewy13th February 2006 19:50

Well, since you are in Portland - you might want to consider the bi-weekly meetings of the PNW2002 group at the Hollgate station. This is a group of mostly older BMW owners and enthusiasts with '02s being the main focus - but some of the members of the group own or have owned E39s in the past - and there are several independent technicians and BMW shop owners that sometimes attend.

Where in Portland are you located? - you can always stop and ask the opinion of some of these independent shops that are close to your whereabouts...

I have had good success with Mike O'hara on the east side (nead PDX) and Jozsy on the west side - but I am sure that people like Ric Farrar, Pacific Motor Sport etc... will also provide good information.


13BREMX513th February 2006 19:53

That's a good idea. I will get in touch with Pacific. They are relatively close to me. I live in Beaverton and I work in Lake Oswego. I found a nice E39 at Freeman Motor Co., but they just sold it. They locate cars so I think I am going to put in the request for a 6 speed, preferably in black, unless I hear something really bad about the E39. Thanks for all of the advice so far!


rloewy13th February 2006 19:56

The only problem I have with Freeman is that they do not allow you to take the car for an inspection - you are supposed to bring your own mechanic on site to do the inspection. Sorry, but for me in these complex cars - no inspection = no sale...


harbir13th February 2006 21:05

I was considering an E39 before I bought the E46. The 5 series has no more legroom in the rear than the E46 (which surprised me) and its trunk is about the same size but better shaped. at real world speeds (under 90mph) the acceleration of the 540 and 330 was the same, by the seat-of-the-pants-o-meter. The E46 is more sports car and more suited to corner thrashing but the E39 has a magical blend of ride and handling. The E46 rides nicely for a car that handles so well, but its far from a magic carpet.

Also, the E39 interior felt more dated but also more luxe than the E46's. the upper half of the dash is very modern, but below that, the console, door panels etc are definitely a generation or two behind the E46.

The 540i is ideal for people who want a driver's car but also want a higher level comfort, quietness, and luxury than the E46 could deliver. but it isn't any roomier or usefully faster.

My dad, who is slower than me over a given section of road than me, but faster over long distances while extracting much less from the car and punishing it much less, would clearly prefer the 540. no question. I'm more the E46 type.

th E39 without sport package is much better than the E46 without sport package. It leans in corner and has a lot of body motion but still hustles very well. the US market tuned E46 without the sport package is a pig by BMW standards.


13BREMX513th February 2006 22:59

I think I will have to take an E46 for a test drive as well. Although, I think the E39's ride might be more appropriate for my needs. Thanks for the input Harbir.


Need4Speed13th February 2006 22:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by harbir

I was considering an E39 before I bought the E46. The 5 series has no more legroom in the rear than the E46 (which surprised me) and its trunk is about the same size but better shaped. at real world speeds (under 90mph) the acceleration of the 540 and 330 was the same, by the seat-of-the-pants-o-meter. The E46 is more sports car and more suited to corner thrashing but the E39 has a magical blend of ride and handling. The E46 rides nicely for a car that handles so well, but its far from a magic carpet.

Also, the E39 interior felt more dated but also more luxe than the E46's. the upper half of the dash is very modern, but below that, the console, door panels etc are definitely a generation or two behind the E46.

The 540i is ideal for people who want a driver's car but also want a higher level comfort, quietness, and luxury than the E46 could deliver. but it isn't any roomier or usefully faster.

My dad, who is slower than me over a given section of road than me, but faster over long distances while extracting much less from the car and punishing it much less, would clearly prefer the 540. no question. I'm more the E46 type.

th E39 without sport package is much better than the E46 without sport package. It leans in corner and has a lot of body motion but still hustles very well. the US market tuned E46 without the sport package is a pig by BMW standards.

I usually agree with harbir, but not on this one. I have a '03 540i with the sports package, and my dad has a '03 330i, with the sports package. I driven both a lot. The 540i dusts the 330i across the power range. (off the line, at 30 mph or at highway speeds) In corners, the 330i has the advantage, because the backend of the 540i will break, so you have to take everything a little slower. As for rear leg room, they both suck, but an adult can ride in the back of a 540i, where only a kid in a car seat can ride in the back of the 330i. As for interior appearenace, everyone I've talked to thinks the 540i looks better then the 330i. It might be becuase the '03 540i sports package has all the M5 badging, and the M5 areokit. All said, I like the 330i better, as it is smaller and zips in and out of lanes and corners better.


13BREMX513th February 2006 23:02

Does anyone know who makes a supercharger for the E39?


Need4Speed13th February 2006 23:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by 13BREMX5

Does anyone know who makes a supercharger for the E39?

Depends on wich engine E39.

"Active Autowerke superchargers" for the M5. Not sure about any of the others


harbir13th February 2006 23:10

http://www.esstuning.com/

and

http://dinancars.com/Series.asp?Seri...is=13&Model=58

the dinan website is the worst I've seen of any company that isn't operating out of a garage. its like they put 100 pagepaper catalogs on one webpage. stupid.


BMWF114th February 2006 00:08

My dad had a 2002 540i 6-Speed which was a fantastic car. The engine is all you will ever need and certainly felt as fast as the 911 convertible our friend had. The only negative I could come up with that particular car was a sensitive and heavy clutch as well as slow steering (could be a little better).


nikkidanjo14th February 2006 00:24

I have a friend with a 2001 530 5spd w/ sport suspension. It is a nice but not perfect car. The power is good even in the 530 so I wouldn't rule one out. I suspect/have heard but can not cite a source that the I6s are generally less trouble than the V8s. I generally like the interiors as they are high quality but not gimmicky like many other cars. The seats in my friend's car are only OK. Better than my Miata but not as good as those in my SAAB or Contour SVT. The problem being he didn't get the super mongo deluxe seats. He just got the mongo deluxe seats. BMW does know how to nickel and dime the buyer.
The car is nice to drive and certainly respectable but I personally would have second thoughts. I never found the car to be as much fun as my Contour. At the same time I didn't find it to ride as comfortably as many other luxury cars. While the ride and handling balance was very good I just felt that if the car isn't going to be as much fun as my Ford, I would rather have it ride much better than my Ford. Perhaps I would prefer the non-sport suspension. However, if I want it to be a luxury mobile then I might be better served by any number of sedans with a lower resale (Jag S-Type, Lincoln LS, Audi... though I fear repair cost on these, SAAB 95, Volvo, BM etc). In a sense it's the perfect car but not the perfect car for me.
Beyond that I was also turned off by the lack of a folding rear seat back (that was an option even at this price point!), a steering wheel that either cuts off the top of the gauges or the LCD at the bottom of the cluster and instrument marking and lighting I find difficult to read. Many of my complaints would be addressed with different option packages so don't assume they apply to all versions of the car.
So personally, I wouldn't spend my money on the car. However, I can understand others wanting to.
Two other notes: The power adjust in my friend's car has been making some truely awful noises for a while now. Lots of money to get fixed.
I'm not sure about this generation of BMW but I know the German cars in general are moving in a direction were you can not fix things without using the shop computer. In the case of Audi, many parts that otherwise would be a remove and replace type fix require the technician to connect the shop computer. That means that even if you the DIY guy knows what’s wrong you still have to take it to the shop. With any luxury car you consider I would look into that. Nothing worse than having to spend $200 to have the dealer tell your computer everything is ok with that new part.


harbir14th February 2006 00:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Need4Speed

I usually agree with harbir, but not on this one.

we only seem to disagree on how accelerative one is relative to the other.

the 540 is faster yes, but its not a difference large enough to be a deciding factor other things not mattering, if you see what I mean. the step from the 330 to the 540 in performance is smaller than the step from the 325 to the 330 for example.

I believe the 290hp 540 is quicker than the 282hp version by more than just 8hp would make you think. perhaps that hightens the difference to where its large to you. I've not driven the 290hp car.

I don't think we've disagree on any other point.


mrpresident14th February 2006 03:55

It's been a few years since I bought my E30 BMW, but in Portland there is almost no compelling reason to buy a BMW from a dealer. There are so many available from private parties that were very well cared for. This is very much a BMW city and there are good deals to be had if you watch Craigslist, the Oregonian classifieds, or just drive around the west hills on a sunny day. There are several good shops here to get an inspection done.

I'm partial to six cylinder BMW's, but there is no reason to avoid the 540 unless it is one of the ones that had an alumasil block that wasn't fixed in the recall.


nikkidanjo14th February 2006 09:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by harbir

we only seem to disagree on how accelerative one is relative to the other.

the 540 is faster yes, but its not a difference large enough to be a deciding factor other things not mattering, if you see what I mean. the step from the 330 to the 540 in performance is smaller than the step from the 325 to the 330 for example.

I believe the 290hp 540 is quicker than the 282hp version by more than just 8hp would make you think. perhaps that hightens the difference to where its large to you. I've not driven the 290hp car.

I don't think we've disagree on any other point.

Based on BMW's history of HP ratings I wouldn't be surprised if one of those numbers was underrated. I think it was the 323 vs 328 where the 323 was almost as quick as the 328. One of the magazines did some HP estimates and said the 328 was about spot on (something like 190hp). The 323 was basically the same estimated power as the 325 at something like 185. BMW wanted to make sure the 328 buyer felt like they were getting something for the extra cash.


bonswa9314th February 2006 10:49

1997 was the first year for the E39. I bought one new - a 528i. While I loved the car and have only recently sold it, it had a lot of problems. Unless you are good with tools and plan to do most of your own work a '97 E39 will be very expensive to own. The 540 even more so than a 528.

In my last 2 years of ownership I experienced, and you can expect:
Radiator leaks
Water pump failure
Window regulator failure (multiple times)
ASC/DSC controller problems
Airbag/seat occupancy sensor (SRS) probs
Final Stage Resistor (HVAC related) probs
AC Compressor failure
Wheel bearing replacement
Instrument MID/LED failure
O2 Sensor failure
Water Leaks (sunroof and door panels)
Catalytic Convertor Failure

Total repairs exceeded $4K

A couple of good sites:

http://www.540i6.com/probsfixes.html

http://bimmer.roadfly.com/bmw/forums/e39


chris holland14th February 2006 14:57

Water pump failure is going to be a given on the v/8s and v/12s too...I have a friend who has owned 7-series models since the early 90s and it seems to happen every 60,000 miles. Granted the Miata has the same propensity, but the difference in cost between the two cars is significant. He's consistently gone through wheel bearings around that interval as well.

And a heads up on the cupholders--they are flimsy and run about $200 to replace.

--Chris


10AEDeb14th February 2006 15:18

My husband had a 2002 Lease 540i 6 speed. While it was a bit big for my taste, I was always amazed at the 29MPG it got. Smooth. I didn't like the shifter, either. and my elbow wanted to hit the seat bolster when I slapped it into 2nd, 4th or 6th. Annoying, but not terminal.

Great car. When we turned it in the dealership said they had never seen such a clean car after 3 years. And it sold within a week.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18.
Page 1 of 31 23>

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©1994 - 2024, Eunos Communications LLC

MX-5 Miata Forum -  BMW 540i Opinions Needed (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Moshe Kshlerin

Last Updated:

Views: 5936

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (77 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Moshe Kshlerin

Birthday: 1994-01-25

Address: Suite 609 315 Lupita Unions, Ronnieburgh, MI 62697

Phone: +2424755286529

Job: District Education Designer

Hobby: Yoga, Gunsmithing, Singing, 3D printing, Nordic skating, Soapmaking, Juggling

Introduction: My name is Moshe Kshlerin, I am a gleaming, attractive, outstanding, pleasant, delightful, outstanding, famous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.